Okay, so we have an interesting case here. A decentralized exchange with fiat withdrawal and KYC/AML. Benefits of a decentralized exchange are typically not having KYC/AML and transparency of transactions. Can you really call it decentralized when it depends on KYC/AML and an interconnection with a centralized exchange?
It doesn't have to be an anonymous, or even pseudonymous to be decentralized. Imho is enough if you own your own private key.
Totally agree. We need more fiat transactions in decentralized exchanges. I dont think there is any decentralized exchange working right now which has good volume. Ternion may revolutionize the market.