Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: [prison break] Keeping an eye on users with red trust from Lauda
by
actmyname
on 08/10/2018, 05:32:25 UTC
I didn't thought Lauda will get removed from DT, but finally I am seeing this thread today.

I suggest you to put negative those have scammed instead of an eye. Scammers never learn a lesson instead of scamming others.
Your neg was literally based on hearsay evidence. It's inadmissible. I went ahead and checked just now.
In fact, none of those users from the single PM where one user mentioned a team should be given a negative without hard evidence.

Here's the list of names:

Code:
Mysterious01
llhibionada
adiksau0414
Sleepy18
UCHCHILD
ScAryme
CryptosapienZA
Phalo
zedkiel08
Mandy7575
dipok07
mariah.sadio
hadang
velosepur
miguel tiu
bamb
sammed
babsjoe
DARKANGEL6415
matico
endlasuresh
johnrickdalaygon
FDC1412
Bakukang
dinos69
estanislao1994
mpet5000
Webelong
jameyap32
themathiasmiller
arsenia
tinochan412
bonghip
creatine413
seriin
Text
rroyk
jituroych
Guzztsar
Rahadsr
seanpeabody
Soyab Khan
Coolwave
ABk195
jhenzdelacruz
Mehedi72
Chickenjoy
rishabhdtu1854

If you are going through Lauda's list, please ignore these users. I believe that it is important to keep from a precedent which empowers scammers' ability to frame others.