I had forgotten about that minor typo. I corrected it within minutes of posting and before anyone had even commented on it. I suspect you are the only one who even noticed.
I do find it a little sad that after hundreds of pages of debate and logical arguments you are reduced to attempted character assassination and grasping at minor typos from two and a half years ago.
...
When someone says humanity was created in the image of our creator, you know you are dealing with someone who does not understand biology. The conversation is over at that point.
...
The only question remains, how severe their delusion is.
...
Guess what Coincube, evolution does not need faith, expanding universe does not need faith, 4.5 Billion years old Earth does not need faith, etc. we have data, we don't need faith.
More personal attacks. It seems that debate has achieved all it can at this time. For the record, however, I have never argued against evolution.
We all have faith. Some of us understand our faith. Others do not.
Dear lord never thought my first message here would be about this , so basically humanity is created/designed in the image of the creator but ignore the motion of how the creator came to be in the first place and it's existence is accepted by you as a starting point.
As I noted above saying humanity was created in the image of God may have a more nuanced meaning then is commonly appreciated.
Nevertheless I do accept the existence of the creator as a starting point. Here is why this is the most reasonable place to start.
An Argument for God