if you don't see that you still get a significantly higher hash rate with GPU for the price of the ASIC Scrypt I don't know what to say.
Power usage savings of even 1k watts, is minimal considering the much higher hash output.
Do the math please, then really let it sink in.
I appreciate your condescension. Let me reciprocate it.
The cost of the 3MH/s model is 11190 Chinese Yuan, or $1849.19 according to the suppliers website.
That is currently $0.61/kH
Lets just say you can get 280Xs left and right for $300 because you are a fucking wicked smooth barterer. You also get 800kH/s on each card because you are a configuration specialist. So just for the cards, you are paying $0.375/kH. Lets not even factor in electricity or other components you need for your rig as we all have closets full of spare computer parts to build endless rigs. You are getting a 40% discount on hashing power with GPUs compared to an ASIC.
Thankfully, you dont have to worry about ASICs becoming more powerful and more affordable. That never happened with Bitcoin right? Thats why after ASICs came out last year, they were continually outperformed by GPUs. Oh whats that? That shit didnt happen? No fucking shit dumbass.
If there is a chip that is producing 300kH/s right now, then there will be a Scrypt ASIC chip
this year that will make GPU mining ineffective for Scrypt just as last year it became ineffective for SHA256.
You can have this lesson for free. Next time you think your math is great, you should think a little more progressively and stop being short-sighted.
So basically, in your opinion, ASICS will continue to grow at an exponentially powerful rate until they destroy GPUs this year....and everyone who disagrees with your 'yet to be invented' phantom ASIC chip is being short-sighted.
Honest question, do you actually know the difference between SHA256, and Scrypt? Do you actually know WHY it's difficult to make a scrypt ASIC chip?
Maybe you should do more homework before spouting off about chips that will crush GPU mining, in the future.