Byteball is clearly undervalued compared to many other projects out there.

However this was always going to happen due to the initial distribution of giving HUGE amounts of the minting free to other ico managers.

This was compounded by the messing with the distribution plans over and over.

I agree stopping byteballs based on bitcoin linked but people who bought byteball on the understanding of getting a kind of bb pos payout on full moons should have got them.

All of this folding and steam and other social media is doing nothing. Nobody gets enough to have any real stake in the project and just dumps their dust alsoI  believe most of it is just gamed away since we can seem to muster no votes to get on any exchanges even though we have apparently given some to 1000's of people.

I mean may be better just to give 10% to binance or kucoin directly or some other large exchange.




Best plan = tony keeps 5% and burns the rest

or

tony gets some team together of developers that can push this design to full potential and give them some stake in the project.  I think a total of 15% is more than enough to secure long term development for that.

burn the rest or airdrop it all to currenty holders who more than deserve it for clinging on this long

this project does not deserve to be knocked out of the top 50 and to see it kicked from the top 200 is insane.

I am still accumulating for long term but tonych needs to get involved with the community a lot more.

I would advice taking a more David zimbeck approach. This dev is very active in coding but also answers and listens to his community on many things and takes times to explain his actions so that the community has a lot of faith even when price tanks with all the other alts.

Byteball needs a team not just 1 or 2 people in almost complete isolation.