I don't recall him agreeing at all. I actually remember him saying what Ken is doing is blatantly wrong and illegal. He said something along the lines of his personal shares of ACTM have nothing to do with the Bitfunder/Weexchange issue and Ken can't just take them from him.
I remember him saying that as well at the beginning and he clarified in a few earlier posts (Thank you Ukyo)
To be clear: I have no issues with 100% of funds from the sale of all ActM Shares assigned to me to be distributed to weex users.
Everyone should be able to see the numbers.
-Ukyo
All we need now is Ken to clarify that once his 106 BTC is gained back from shares, will the rest of the BTC from shares sold be given to Ukyo to distribute to WeEx users.
I imagine that Ken only wants the companies BTC back plus possibly legal expenses which would make sense.