Re: UPDATED [prison break] Full list of users who lost their DT red trust from Lauda
I don't know about how right or wrong Lauda was with his/her trust feedback, but if a user deserves the negative feedback, wouldn't they have received it from more users than just Lauda? Therefore, won't they still be red?
I also believe (as already mentioned) that users shouldn't take the whole list in Lauda's feedback as 100% valid, just like any other human it's possible Lauda did mistakes and gave negative feedback for false reasons. For me who is relative new to the forums and I don't know Lauda well, I feel that the fact he/she is was removed from the DT list is an extra factor which supports the above claim.
That is a nonsense way of thinking. My feedback was on-point pretty much >98% of the time. Whether someone wants to back up a rating or not has nothing to do with its validity.I also believe (as already mentioned) that users shouldn't take the whole list in Lauda's feedback as 100% valid, just like any other human it's possible Lauda did mistakes and gave negative feedback for false reasons. For me who is relative new to the forums and I don't know Lauda well, I feel that the fact he/she is was removed from the DT list is an extra factor which supports the above claim.
Accounts listed on SMAS.
I don't believe anyone listed on SMAS got tagged for being on SMAS, they got tagged for trying to cheat it despite explicit warnings not to do so. A lot of people seem keen on letting attempted cheaters walk free, while at the same time asking for permanent bans for other attempted cheaters (e.g. plagiarism). Quote
[...]trust me, im gonna do my very best to pull you down also.!!!! Goodluck... And by the way, You are not Laudia. Laudia did this before and right now he is gone.
