Here's a good start: why not make the argument in this thread, right here and now, as to what is so "out of line" about "Mike's actions" that the community ought to reject him/his work?
I think this not right or misleading.
Who can really reject his patches? Only Gavin, right? Gavin won't reject his patches because they are buddies ...
That's why people are asking for a different way to stop Hearns involvement.