From that post :
For sure, if we changed absolute numbers to the relatives compare the number of all users in each group to number of users who have ever received any merit this analysis would probably look little bit different higher ranks would show bigger percent users who has been merited
I wrote about a bit about it earlier here:
Quote from: cryptovigi on October 04, 2018, 12:17:36 AM
...
Rank number of users number of users
received at least
1 merit
number of users
with who didnt
earn any merit
Member 27 918 4 744 (17%) 23 174 (83%)
Full Member 18 181 3 173 (17,45%) 15 008 (82,55%)
Sr. Member 9 016 1 818 (20,16%) 7 198 (79,84%)
Hero Member 4 143 1 105 (26,67%) 3 038 (73,33%)
Legendary 2 145 1 133 (52,82%) 1 012 (47,18%)
...
But the difference is not as much so lets leave it - its not a point of my consideration today.
To sum it up for you, If 100 newbies out of 10000 newbies got a 100 merit, and 80 legendaries out of a 100 got 100 merit... I hope you can complete the sentence.
Those stats are also missing vital information about distribution. I should include mine that I posted a few posts ago :
...
Numbers! I love numbers! You count 22925 users who received at least 1 merit, nice. I count :
- 4% who received more or equal to 50 merit.
- 25% who received more or equal to 10 merit.
- 33% who received more or equal to 5 merit.
- 48% who received more or equal to 3 merit.
(all percentages are inclusive of ranks above them).
So basically, half the accounts that ever got merit, never got merited again. And the top 5% of people who got merited, are AT LEAST 50 times more likely than your average user to get merited.
Quick Edit : Also not to forget that these are 22k users who got merited at all. I wonder if we could get stats of Posts by Seniors Merited / Total Posts by Seniors, Full, Hero, Legendary. That oughtta be a fun sight.
.....
It's not because it has MYTHBUSTERS written in caps, and shiny pics that it makes any sort of statistical sense.