Your message is a bit rude.
1/
Actually, the mine was not part of a marketing plan....They just really thought that it was possible to install ASICS there. So why they didn't do so ? I think they realized that because of moisture and dust it would really decrease the lifetime of the ASICS.
2/
As soon as the vote for contract mining has been released, i for sure tried to explain on the telegram channel that we should all vote "NO" if it's linked with Rock2 project. Otherwise, it would be disadvantageous for ROCK2 holders....and it would bring the mess : not possible anymore to track if our payouts are correct according to the size of the farm. So Dias banned me
(even if i was polite) and said that this mining contracts would be something different than ROCK2 tokens (a kind of separate project). I don't know if he said that because he really thought it from the beginning or if he realized after submitting the vote that he was trying too hard to fuck us. I think the 2nd variant is the right one.
When the vote was released, i was consulting this telegram page....I was very surprised to see that more than 20 Yes appeared very very quickly. during the first minutes the "Yes" was winning. I strongly suppose that all colleagues of IRM company where asked to say "YES" as soon as the vote was submitted (to establish a "trend")...Hopefully the "NO" has largely won.
4/
They must last 3 years at least (new piece of information for me). Otherwise some investors (specially the last investors of phase2) will never get a payback equal to the amount they invested. I don't know laws in KZK, but if you do foundraising and deliberately don't complete the conditions to give a chance to the investors to get a payback, it's not legal in some countries.
Actually, investing in ROCK2 ICO was not a good idea...but buying ROCK2 tokens when the tokens became tradeable on the exchange (at this time the price was very low) was maybe not such a bad investment.
So I repeat, to my opinion, they didn't want to scam at the beginning. It's just that due to their huge lack of experience, the project has not run as smooth as foreseen. It can only be better now (and will be i think).
IRM is risky for sure, but still think it's possible to make some profits with this project.
1/
Actually, the mine was not part of a marketing plan....They just really thought that it was possible to install ASICS there. So why they didn't do so ? I think they realized that because of moisture and dust it would really decrease the lifetime of the ASICS.
2/
As soon as the vote for contract mining has been released, i for sure tried to explain on the telegram channel that we should all vote "NO" if it's linked with Rock2 project. Otherwise, it would be disadvantageous for ROCK2 holders....and it would bring the mess : not possible anymore to track if our payouts are correct according to the size of the farm. So Dias banned me
(even if i was polite) and said that this mining contracts would be something different than ROCK2 tokens (a kind of separate project). I don't know if he said that because he really thought it from the beginning or if he realized after submitting the vote that he was trying too hard to fuck us. I think the 2nd variant is the right one. When the vote was released, i was consulting this telegram page....I was very surprised to see that more than 20 Yes appeared very very quickly. during the first minutes the "Yes" was winning. I strongly suppose that all colleagues of IRM company where asked to say "YES" as soon as the vote was submitted (to establish a "trend")...Hopefully the "NO" has largely won.
4/
They must last 3 years at least (new piece of information for me). Otherwise some investors (specially the last investors of phase2) will never get a payback equal to the amount they invested. I don't know laws in KZK, but if you do foundraising and deliberately don't complete the conditions to give a chance to the investors to get a payback, it's not legal in some countries.
Actually, investing in ROCK2 ICO was not a good idea...but buying ROCK2 tokens when the tokens became tradeable on the exchange (at this time the price was very low) was maybe not such a bad investment.
So I repeat, to my opinion, they didn't want to scam at the beginning. It's just that due to their huge lack of experience, the project has not run as smooth as foreseen. It can only be better now (and will be i think).
IRM is risky for sure, but still think it's possible to make some profits with this project.