the whitepaper for XSPEC also has a few grammar issues which i couldnt find in XSPC's white paper.
FYI Mixins and mixin should be Mixing's and mixing.
it looks bad on the 2016 spectre to see them trying to discredit a project that's built with the goals to help other cryptos and create a standard on what coins should have and help those coins using that community.
FYI as well, smart ass, a
mixin is term for a 'dummy' anonymous transaction output used in a ring signature and is not the same as the word 'mixing' and
mixins is the plural of mixin. Think of it as a mix-in, something that you mix in with something else.
i cant find many online resources to back up the claim that mixin is a word. mix-in would be grammatically correct
and there is 0 dictionary's that contain mixin as a word. with that meaning not even urban.