Post
Topic
Board Meta
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: Bias on giving merit, forum negativity and positivity to the newbies.
by
Coolcryptovator
on 23/10/2018, 04:35:10 UTC
⭐ Merited by TMAN (1)
NEWBIE + GOOD POST = IGNORE
HIGH RANK + GOOD POST = MERITS

Not agree with that, I was newbie and I have earned enough merit. Even my earned merit Sr. potential but I am still full member. You are wrong, why are you wrong? Just visit my merit history you will get answer. If you made quality post then you will get merit, no matter what is your rank.

Bitcointalk will be full of newbies with negativity. This will not likely to make everybody enjoy the stay in the forum.
  
Actually they are not newbie, they are spambie. To be honest I have visited you profile, your intention is only earn merit. You haven't contribute anything new. Just repeating old history.  

Edit
However, I want to confirm you even high rank member's  not encourage send merit to your good post then there is merit source. They will send merit you, you no need to ask or wait for old member's. But your post should be quality. Also admin encourage for meriting on good post ( not only better post). Let's see admin intention.
Well, the last instructions that I was given by theymos was as follows:

~snip

I recommend:
 - If a newbie posts something that could be even called good, then give them 1 merit. It doesn't need to be a great post.
 - It's best to use all of your source merit. If you don't naturally do so, try giving people more merit per post on average. If you don't send your source merit, then nobody gets it, but if you do send it, then the recipient can pass half of it on.
 
Thanks!