Explain briefly why do the Questra organizers deside to attack Worldcore and Pavel Krymov.
[...] the choice fell on worldcore. I don't know excatly how this happened, by that's it.
You know nothing about why Questra started the attack on Worldcore, but at the same time you speak with confidence about it and that Worldcore is the suffered party of this conflict in your opinion.
You deny any possibility that swindler Pavel Krymov is related to Worldcore and all
aforementioned links should be ignored as you say.
Good afternoon! I have already
mentioned that it was an attempt of shifting legal responsibility to other people - as organizers of financial pyramids will take a term of imprisonment.
My opinion means nothing here, but
your proofs sound unconvincingly when you mix everything:
1) alex nasonov,
2)worldcore,
3)pavel krymov,
4)allegedly fake name of employees,
5) court's decision on "pravda"
-
1) the fact that your colleague, marina, is digging through nasonov's dirty laundry by publishing his photo with
a beautiful woman doesn't contribute to proofs (vice versa - it's an
open blackmailing). moreover, all of us remember
fake video where he allegedly confesses in scamming.
-
2) the roadmap is being
fulfilled. if some point is not done - it just takes a little bit more time to be realized. you can't deny this. the exchange is still
working.
-
3) there's still no clear relation of krymov to worldcore. some photo from his forex trend conference is a "so-so" proof that doesn't mean his tough relation to worldcore (you
wrote it yourself).
-
4) you mean alex salonsky.
xtraelv already
mentioned that
anyone but him could create a profile instead of alex at social-oriented network website. not checkable.
moreover, there's a huge nubmer of related links and
photos that uncover and proof his personality as alexey salonsky
indeed-
5) journalists follow the "honest opinion" defense policy that's why they deleted the article
before the court session and, probably, that's why the court denied to fulfill the requirements of worldcore on defending honor and diginity, and receiving a compensation:
In a lot of countries there is a legal defense called "honest opinion". As long as the journalist can show that they based their opinion on information that led to their reasonable opinion at the time they are immune from a defamation lawsuits. However if they receive information to the contrary later that contradicts that and by applying that newly gained knowledge does not lead to a reasonable opinion anymore they have to stop publishing that opinion (in the case of online content) it in order to be eligible for such defense.
-------------------
and the final point. being an
investor, I believe in the company's success and I'm so much concerned that you are collecting all the negative points against worldcore (
it's an accusation) trying to speculate on worldcore's reputation and the wrc token price as well that, by the way,
has grown by 2% today. these actions I consider as a
planned discrediting campaign rather than an attempt to reach the truth.
have a nice day!