Re: Can we establish a division for posters according to their quality?
To clarify: I didnt mean that the forum should stablish a division and those ranks should appear on the profile, or as a badge or whatever.
It was just an idea I had in mind that people could use for everyday use. We all know who the best posters are and who the shitposters are, but what about those who dont fall in those categories? What do you call them? Do you know why you call them like that or do you have a rough idea.
I have an own concept for those who are not shitposters and not exceptional posters, so they fall into not bad, OK, and good poster categories, but it is just a rough idea.
Not really
This forum is like the world, we all have the same opportunities and we are under the same laws, some people have more advantages because they are more intelligent by birth for example, but I like both a world and a forum where there is healthy competition and where we are not equal, even though Im not the best and I'll probably never be.
My opinion is that the people whom deserve to rank up should be mainly knowledgeable in crypto currency, not in how the forum works.
...
Yeah, posting about posting about posting
Although this goes a bit off topic, I agree.
It was just an idea I had in mind that people could use for everyday use. We all know who the best posters are and who the shitposters are, but what about those who dont fall in those categories? What do you call them? Do you know why you call them like that or do you have a rough idea.
I have an own concept for those who are not shitposters and not exceptional posters, so they fall into not bad, OK, and good poster categories, but it is just a rough idea.
I appreciate the suggestion put in, but dont you think we are becoming too much obsessed with "being able to make quality posts".
Not really
This is a forum after all and we expect people from all types of backgrounds to come in and make a variety of posts with different opinions. Some people will be able to make posts that are exceptionally put in and some will not. If we try to make divisions between them it will increase the current divide between the people who are well known and newbies who are trying their best to rank up.
Maybe as a sort of experiment personally someone could do it. But the info if made public would be like a public disgrace to others and I am sure it will become a source of mockery.
Maybe as a sort of experiment personally someone could do it. But the info if made public would be like a public disgrace to others and I am sure it will become a source of mockery.
This forum is like the world, we all have the same opportunities and we are under the same laws, some people have more advantages because they are more intelligent by birth for example, but I like both a world and a forum where there is healthy competition and where we are not equal, even though Im not the best and I'll probably never be.
Right now, the people earning merit the fastest are the ones that are compiling and analyzing merit data. :/
Yes, you are right. Some of them didn't earn merit for anything else but merit analysis which is sad.My opinion is that the people whom deserve to rank up should be mainly knowledgeable in crypto currency, not in how the forum works.
...
Yeah, posting about posting about posting
Although this goes a bit off topic, I agree.