Is this how liberalists respond when their arguments get subjectively, anecdotally or objectively crushed (depending on which kind they attempted to use)? "Memes are offensive"; "If you don't use the tone that I want you to, you are [insertSomeWhinyBullshit][1]"? Because that's exactly what happened here. None of the lame excuses that you've made have any basis, neither theoretical nor practical.
Your class A example, i.e. OP, is an example that confirms that the work of the mentioned users is not only warranted, but just, and more necessary than ever before.

---

[1] This isn't a research paper; grow up and learn to deal with proper usage of language. Classic butthurt-scammer play.