Reading the topic, and others on the same subject, some contradictory arguments emerge from the same people without them noticing some facts that I will quote: As a person had a doubt about their investments in cryptocurrencies in a possible crisis, a member quoted:
 ''diversify their investments, do not put all the eggs in the same basket'' Because diversifying was the only way to survive the market.

And when the matter is the global financial crisis I see arguments like: ''all people go to precious metals'' Or all people go to the Bitcoin,  Or else ''all will come out of bitcoin to buy everything that is breaking at the lowest possible price''.

When it comes to Bitcoin, being a market that its members are much more active and connected with it, and most of these people not only believe,
as it does everything for their ecosystem to grow, and knowing the promising future of Bitcoin, I was wondering what It leads people to claim that
practically all the money would go out of the market to wherever it is. To crash as bad as the global fellowships.

 Only the NYSE has 21 trillion in its possession currently if 1% of only one market run to the cryptocurrencies in the middle of the blood bath, the impact on the price will be enormous, and who wanted to buy everything that was breaking, very cheap, now will have more money for it , only with the
profit of desperation from the other markets.
  
Now let's go to the questions I was asking myself: Why the hell does it have bitcoin possessions going to fly with 100% of their portfolio for who knows what? Why when it comes to bitcoins investors will they take everything they have and run from the market? And 90% are eager for the next bull run? Why would the big players in an attempt to save their capital, not think of diversifying their portfolios by buying bitcoins, gold, or wherever they are going to run? Will everyone run in the same direction? and inflate only one asset?

 If we put on a scale, the much money in fact that can leave the bitcoin market comparing with what can enter is simply absurd the difference. Even if a few billion go out, for each of those who leave, I believe it will enter 10, and in a short time. The real money holders will diversify their portfolios, regardless of the size of the crisis, the bitcoin will absorb part of this diversification, and 1% of all that enter will be 10x higher than anything you think about leaving. Who has 100 billion will not buy 100 billion in gold, He will use the moment when he will be forced to move this, or will have enormous losses, and will surely put part of it in bitcoins. and 1% in 1% of the world diversifying portfolios, we will have perhaps the greatest victory of all, the first.

Don't think the market's not ready enough, it is.
If you forgotten what is the real purpose of the creation of Bitcoin by Satoshi, is for these moments.  


(If I made a mistake, I'm sorry, English is not my native language.)