Re: What's more important to judge whether or not I should be trusted?

Quote from: The Pharmacist on October 24, 2018, 10:16:59 PM

Quote from: Lauda on October 24, 2018, 03:30:01 PM

OP attempted to blackmail us into removing their ratings. We got tagged for not giving in. Any attempts at making their ratings appear under a real pretense is therefore void (actually makes them a even less trustworthy).

I still have the PMs from iluvbitcoins he sent me after I tagged him, and I can't speak for Lauda but iluvbitcoins didn't try to blackmail me into removing my feedback.

You don't seem to have experienced with 'act-nice-blackmail', which this was.

Quote from: LoyceV on October 25, 2018, 08:43:29 AM

Since you asked for opinions, I'll give you mine: From the moment I saw the red tag on OP, I thought it was a bit harsh.

OP is dishonest; there's nothing harsh here. Their behavior post-rejecting to obeying their requests proves that.

Quote from: ibminer on October 25, 2018, 11:17:58 AM

I'm not familiar with offering loans and accepting accounts as collateral, but would it be normal practice to take control of the staked address of the account they are getting as collateral for a loan? I thought it was normally just the account login information provided?

I don't think so.