Re: What's more important to judge whether or not I should be trusted?
I've been slandering?
And you've just claimed I blackmailed you HAHAH
I've just posted all the 3 PMs I've sent you.
Let's let the users decide for themselves whether or not that's blackmail.
You received the BTC. Where is the risk?
So I take it as a "yes" then. You would falsely claim a hack/unauthorized access to reverse a F&F transaction.
You just said I was sending bitcoins, how am I receiving them?
Can you first have a talk with yourself in order to decide what you want to say?
Now you're starting to annoy me.
It is an explanation on why there's 'risk' in that transaction and you know it yourself!
If I wrote there isnt' any risk for the sender in an I&S transaction because you can charge it back, would that mean I would falsely claim I haven't received an item?
You're hilarious.
Why are you trying so hard to paint me as an immoral man?
And you've just claimed I blackmailed you HAHAH
I've just posted all the 3 PMs I've sent you.
Let's let the users decide for themselves whether or not that's blackmail.
Quote
1.http://prntscr.com/laujf6
This is the simmilar english equivalent I've sent to The Pharmacist.
http://prntscr.com/laukmw
2.http://prntscr.com/laul0v
3.http://prntscr.com/laulccf
This is the simmilar english equivalent I've sent to The Pharmacist.
http://prntscr.com/laukmw
2.http://prntscr.com/laul0v
3.http://prntscr.com/laulccf
If I sent F&F first there is still risk in the transaction!
Since I need to claim unauthorized access in order to charge back if scammed and that easily results in account suspension if found out to be a lie.
Read first, be rude later.
Since I need to claim unauthorized access in order to charge back if scammed and that easily results in account suspension if found out to be a lie.
Read first, be rude later.
You received the BTC. Where is the risk?
So I take it as a "yes" then. You would falsely claim a hack/unauthorized access to reverse a F&F transaction.
You just said I was sending bitcoins, how am I receiving them?
Can you first have a talk with yourself in order to decide what you want to say?
Now you're starting to annoy me.
It is an explanation on why there's 'risk' in that transaction and you know it yourself!
If I wrote there isnt' any risk for the sender in an I&S transaction because you can charge it back, would that mean I would falsely claim I haven't received an item?
You're hilarious.
Why are you trying so hard to paint me as an immoral man?