I like maximum decentralization. The presence of large token owners prevents this. But this is my subjective opinion, maybe I'm wrong.
The desire for maximum decentralization is a reasonable desire. But I do not think that the ownership of any part of the tokens gives the right to vote in the project and the right to somehow manage it.
But if someone owns a large proportion of tokens, then he can control the price. From the point of view of the market model, the token distribution model is most beneficial when there are many small owners.