Re: My Legendary account has been banned, any Modo to tell me why ?
So regarding the ownership of guigui371 (funny i have to justify myself to someone that bought a legendary account for $600 
)
Ref : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4476583.msg40261507#msg40261507
I know you have stated that you wont use it. But promisses are just promisses
Who says that you are not going to use it tomorrow ?
) Ref : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4476583.msg40261507#msg40261507
I know you have stated that you wont use it. But promisses are just promisses
Who says that you are not going to use it tomorrow ?
Have I used it though? And how does that relate to your ban?
By the way it is funny that you point the fact that i staked my my address not long ago, when you staked yours just 6 weeks before mine
Now you're just making shit up. Where did I "point the fact"?
I will,
I don't deny that i have copied and pasted part of a message, one time only in almost 5 years and 1236 messages.
I wasn't aware of the 33 rules of the forum (i discovered them a few days ago thanks to your signature)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657
To be honest the thread was created after i joined the forum. But doesnt change the fact that someone curious would check the rules periodically and check that he is obeying the guidelines.
I don't often go to the english board . / meta
Also those are the unofficial rules, i can't find the official ones.
And it doesnt explicit says that at the 1st (and only) occurence of breaking a rule it is a permanent Ban. (does it ? i really can't find it).
Especially in my case breaking rule 33 one time.
However I do aggree that some rules should be strictly enforced (29, 17, 8 .....)
In my case the modo could have just deleted the message, gave me a big slap on the hand or temporary Ban.
Anyway, nothing more to add, i've ut forward my "plagiarism" and the fact that it is 54% original.
And i have proven that i didn't buy guigui37 (by the way, rule 18 is weird, it allows people to farm accounts !! how is that allowed).
Now it is wait and see.
Cheers
I don't deny that i have copied and pasted part of a message, one time only in almost 5 years and 1236 messages.
I wasn't aware of the 33 rules of the forum (i discovered them a few days ago thanks to your signature)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657
To be honest the thread was created after i joined the forum. But doesnt change the fact that someone curious would check the rules periodically and check that he is obeying the guidelines.
I don't often go to the english board . / meta
Also those are the unofficial rules, i can't find the official ones.
And it doesnt explicit says that at the 1st (and only) occurence of breaking a rule it is a permanent Ban. (does it ? i really can't find it).
Especially in my case breaking rule 33 one time.
However I do aggree that some rules should be strictly enforced (29, 17, 8 .....)
In my case the modo could have just deleted the message, gave me a big slap on the hand or temporary Ban.
Anyway, nothing more to add, i've ut forward my "plagiarism" and the fact that it is 54% original.
And i have proven that i didn't buy guigui37 (by the way, rule 18 is weird, it allows people to farm accounts !! how is that allowed).
Now it is wait and see.
Cheers
The enforcement of the rules is based on how moderators interpret them, not you. Of course a banned user is probably not gonna like the rule they got banned for. But that same rule has been applied to thousands of users just in the past month, including half a dozen other Legendaries. An appeal can succeed only if you can show that the moderator made a mistake. Here are a couple of examples for recent successful appeals:
- A user was framed. Someone created a web page, copied user's post into it, and reported the user for plagiarism. User got banned, appealed, theymos figured out the scheme, user got unbanned.
- A user quoted improperly and it seemed like they copied the text. User got banned, appealed, theymos concluded that the intent was indeed to quote, user got unbanned.
In this context your plagiarism is not a mistake - you intentionally took someone's text and tried to pass it as your own. Your argument that 50% plagiarism is not plagiarism sounds kinda weak. You could get kicked out of college if you intentionally plagiarized 50% or 10% or even just the intro paragraph of a paper.
So what I'm saying is - work some more on that appeal, don't waste your time trolling me with useless tripe. I don't have a dog in this fight, just waiting to see how it works out for you.