I do want to thank Mike Hearn for coming into this thread and clarifying what, without context, sounds very troubling. So, thanks, Mike.
But realize that supporting measures that break the fungibility of bitcoin (black/redlisting) have made you very untrustworthy to the bitcoin community. Do you have any clarification of that for us?
And Mike, you do recognise that you've not answered ANY of our concerns regarding externally issued centralised tokens (e.g. passports) - governments running hashes, forgeability, duplication, centralisation, low ownership in MASSIVE parts of the world.
Don't hand wave that 'people can get them if they want', or 'they're just optional'.
Do you recognise that your solution is completely counter to the trustless distributed nature of bitcoin?