Why do you keep bringing up the same irrelevant questions I've answered time and time again. If my analogy isn't relevant to what's being discussed in this thread then neither is the you don't chose to get mugged/raped/murdered ones which is what I was referencing here. And there are many choices to park. You can find somewhere for free, you can pay a council space, or a lot. You can choose. You have not been forced to. Does a man with a gun come round and say you have to pay me no matter what even if you don't have a car or want to park anywhere? No. You can also try park for free illegally if you want and try get away with it, but if you get caught you have to pay a fine, but that's your choice and you were aware of the rules so in fact this is a perfect analogy for this situation and far more apt than the mugged/raped/murdered ones you lot keep brining up.
In your example there is a voluntary agreement between two individuals. However, income taxes involve a third party that is not part of the agreement. Neither of the two individuals have asked the thug with the badge to interfere or otherwise involve himself in the transaction. He forces them to include him. No one is forcing the two individuals to do business. They are free not to do business, but just because two individuals voluntarily choose to do business does not give a third person the right to demand that he be included. He doesn't ask them to include him, he insists that he be included and reminds them that if they don't then there will be consequences.
And if a person owns a lot or a space, he has chosen to own that an operate a business under the rules of the system. So he has not been forced to do anything; he chose to play by the rules and pay into this system, and so do you people. Don't want to pay taxes? Fine, don't own a parking space or a lot or go where there are no taxes for this kind of thing. How is anyone being forced to do anything when they willing give it up and agree to play by the rules set out?
Yes, it's these "rules of the system" that we are discussing. It's these "rules of the system" that need to be changed. It's these "rules of the system" that make it okay to steal if the thieves refer to it as "income tax". It's these "rules of the system" that makes it okay to steal as long as you have a badge. The "rules of the system" are corrupt because the people that make those rules are corrupt. The first step in changing the "rules of the system" is pointing out how immoral the rules and the rulemakers are.
And I wish people would stop bringing up this gun to your head thing. Not everybody lives in America.
The USA isn't the only place in the world where those individuals that enforce the "rules of the system" are allowed to carry guns and use those guns to enforce the "rules of the system".