And how do you explain that you posted the same Twitter link as nguyenthanhhieu did AFTER he'd already posted it? Had he done this previously?
I don't think I understood your question correctly. nguyenthanhhieu is not me so saying "you (me, mdayonliner which I understand I guess) posted the same Twitter link as nguyenthanhhieu did AFTER he'd (who?) already posted it? Had he(who?) done this previously?" is making me confuse. Can you rephrase it please?However I guess I figured the confusion: If I am not wrong then we are talking about this two posts...
https://archive.fo/6wSFj#selection-3065.0-3065.84 post #1011
https://archive.fo/rQ5eg#selection-5981.0-5981.84 post #2199
And the twitter feed is: https://twitter.com/cDesignsUK/status/1003628228907446278
It seems I (mdayonliner) made the last post (#2199). According to the twitter date-time I made this tweet/retweet at 6:23 AM - 4 Jun 2018 nguyenthanhhieu posted it on June 09, 2018, 05:11:05 AM
This is the post which I edited/updated with the draft reports (every time I made a twitter posts and/or facebook posts for the weeks. The original date of the post was May 30, 2018, last edited September 02, 2018). Once I completed the task for a week I copied the report part from the post and submitted the report for the week. Check all the report links posted from for all the weeks (week#1, #2, etc).
What I assume is: for week #2 (post#2199) I was staking my Twitter and Fecebook posts on the draft post#3. Before I completed my task for the whole week nguyenthanhhieu copied from my draft post and made post#1011 on June 09, 2018 which was obviously before my reporting post for that 2nd week June 10, 2018. Now, I see I edited the post on June 17, 2018. I can not recall why I did that but most probably I edited any spelling mistake on the bottom part of the note I left for the bounty manager.
Can anyone find any more info that would link the accounts in question to mdayonliner?
Not exactly it's "any more" (How it's any more where there were no link at all. Anyone can post my twitter feed from their bitcoinTalk account and in this case they already did for whatever the reason)...is talking about a hypothetical scenario.
That's correct.As to the part I bolded above: if you were to find evidence of something like that happening, I would expect someone to bring it forward and challenge me on it, and I'd expect a neg as a result. But since I don't participate in bounties (just the Chipmixer campaign), don't use social media, it would be very hard for someone to frame me like that.
It was a hypothetical scenario which obviously was not meant to you but seems like it happened/happening to me. phantiennghia: A user made 4 posts where one post has bounty submission using my twitter handle
nguyenthanhhieu: A user made 5 posts where one post has bounty submission using my twitter handle.
quangtrung1991: Seems like a typical bounty hunter who posted my twitter username where s/he was suppose to post the Facebook URL. What I assume is he wanted to copy my reporting format, forget to change the URL. Notice the number of followers section: mdayonliner post has 2136 which is close to the current followers 1736 and the other account post has 3023 followers.
The post from quangtrung1991 account seems a mistake from the user where the other two users (phantiennghia and nguyenthanhhieu) post seems planed? or what could be the possible reason. Why would I (mdayonliner) will make two posts on June09 and June12 from two brand new accounts created on April 03 and May 22 when I was doing very well with my mdayonliner account. FIY hilari tagged me on July 09. Another point worth to note is: The fight between me and xtraelv was started on May 19 precisely on May 09. I have no accusation against anyone by the way coz I have really decided to give up from this account. My be I will start over, may be I already did, may be I will never look back to BitcoinTalk life.
nguyenthanhhieu: A user made 5 posts where one post has bounty submission using my twitter handle.
quangtrung1991: Seems like a typical bounty hunter who posted my twitter username where s/he was suppose to post the Facebook URL. What I assume is he wanted to copy my reporting format, forget to change the URL. Notice the number of followers section: mdayonliner post has 2136 which is close to the current followers 1736 and the other account post has 3023 followers.
The post from quangtrung1991 account seems a mistake from the user where the other two users (phantiennghia and nguyenthanhhieu) post seems planed? or what could be the possible reason. Why would I (mdayonliner) will make two posts on June09 and June12 from two brand new accounts created on April 03 and May 22 when I was doing very well with my mdayonliner account. FIY hilari tagged me on July 09. Another point worth to note is: The fight between me and xtraelv was started on May 19 precisely on May 09. I have no accusation against anyone by the way coz I have really decided to give up from this account. My be I will start over, may be I already did, may be I will never look back to BitcoinTalk life.
This is where the issue is. You accuse me of lying but you have not identified a single lie. I have offered to change any mistakes in the information.
If I start listing the lies then I am sure there will be a long list however I am not sure if I am willing to do that but if that is very necessary then I will do that.Quote
All the evidence I have presented I have backed up with a source so people can check it themselves and draw their own conclusions.
The job of a journalist is to provide information not to justify. From the beginning you picked a side, your motive was to destroy me. So you pulled the information and always left your judgement to manipulate the readers. The readers found some of the information from you which were truth and based on that they trusted your manipulated judgement as well. This is how you started everything at the beginning...
Quote
Time to shut down this blackmailing spam clown.
The archive and original post can be read here: http://archive.is/CiVJK#selection-1431.0-1431.47The changed contents of the same post are available here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4019640.msg37869385#msg37869385
Point is, you have edited and updated your posts so many times (after I left the responses of the original posts) that your motives at the very beginning and the motive the user get now (after reading the current contents) are totally opposite.
I guess it's important to know the source of an issue in between two person when they involve in arguments. Your editing and updating of old posts including bringing up those online businesses I was involved in the past - made a very good impression to the community to easily pick a side or why not anyone else (except marlboroza) were talking about (never really bothered to talk about) the last video where I declared publicly that I gave up promoting those businesses?
When I was doing my investigation the user xtraelv had only 133 merits where 33 was earned. Out of that 33 merits, 13 were from Lafu (6 transactions )
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669443.msg36439011#msg36439011 (2)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669443.msg36860882#msg36860882 (2)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669443.msg32362928#msg32362928 (2)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669443.msg31817321#msg31817321 (2)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669443.msg31104253#msg31104253 (2)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669443.msg30798924#msg30798924 (3)
There were 19 merits that sent to Lafu from xtraelv (3 transactions)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669443.msg36746425#msg36746425 (10)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669443.msg33965514#msg33965514 (2)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669443.msg31744134#msg31744134 (7)
All seemed (seems) sent for some customer service for Cryptopia topic. Source: http://loycevsbasement.privatedns.org/Merit/history/897509.html
But for an exchange to take place there would have had to have been some sort of agreement. There was none. I never discussed merits with Lafu until after you made the allegation.
How would I or anyone know? Everyone (including me) have no doubt about the xtraelv now that s/he are capable of earning merits and his/her judgement about sending merits are good enough but that time, people had no idea that the old xtraelv were capable of receiving merits and had a good judgement of sending merits specially after looking at the screenshots above. There is nothing questionable in my feedback. Both feedback is true, previous one and new one.
Questionable because you never wanted to answer the questions I left on the investigation topic.Quote
I didn't wake up later, I am always here.
By waking up I meant about the red trust you left for me. You could left one shortly after hilary tagged me or may be after the PM respond I left for you. What took you too long to tag me?Quote
What conversations OMG. You sent me message to check something and I said I can't find anything and you should report it to admin. That can't be called conversation. What other conversation you have in mind? I can't find them in my PM.
Can you please point me several conversations between?
I had no idea that conversation means only the PMs (which is one or two I guess). Would you ignore the public conversations? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4773983.0Can you please point me several conversations between?
