The problems with their argument is this, Bitcoin Cash has proven 8mb is doable without any major issues,
Btrash bcash didn't prove anything.
The transaction volume on bcash is so extremely low, that blocks are always empty. They even would be called empty with 1 MB block size.
The last 10 blocks have a median size of less than 50 KB. That's 1/20th of the old legacy bitcoin block size. Honestly.. that's a joke. Dogecoin has more transactions than btrash.
Saying bcash has provem 8mb is doable, is delusional.
There other argument is increasing the blocksize won't really scale, the problem with that is they don't need to scale to match visa, they only need to scale to match what bitcoin requires, which 8 mb would handle easily for the foreseeable future.
Please explain:
How can increasing something by a linear factor be called scaling ?
Spoiler: It can't, because that's not scaling. That's ignoring and postponing a problem.
LN will eventually enact a fractional reserve system like the Banks are used too.
It was their diabolical plan all along , IE: The Banks that were funding bitcoin development.
Dafuq. Did you smoke too much weed or where do these retarded conspiracy theories come from ?
