I see lots of opinions you don't agree with. Tell me, which one of them justifies your behavior?
You see lots of opinions I don't agree with because I don't censor (or moderate as us norms call it) based on my opinions.
Thanks for helping to prove my point again and your inability to grasp simple logic.
I defend the "trolls" "right" to post here the same as the other users here so I guess the rules justify my behavior. I'm allowed to called them what I think they are, it is an opinion board after all....
You on the other hand have only your discriminatory posts and desire to have me censored to justify your behavior.
School is in session sunshine, keep em coming!
I see claims. I see lots of self reassurance. I don't see any explanation of your behavior. The post was clearly an on topic reply you simply had no decent response to because you KNOW it went to far. Rather than admit that mistake, you instead opted to move my post somewhere else on the forum in a sad attempt to censor while pretending you are not censoring, and also immediately put me on the defensive by having this weird out of place post in reputation that looks like I posted the OP. Considering all I did was participate in a political discussion, I would say you have more explaining to do here than I do.
So if you can take a break from telling yourself how much winning you are doing, can you explain to me why this direct response was not on topic? Because you feel it was insulting? If that is the case pretty much all of your posts directed at me would be off topic as they include direct insults. Not that I really care if you insult me, it is just pretty glaring how there are a set of standards for yourself, and then for people you disagree with.