Actually it would prove everything.
That was such an epic thread that brought out all the good bugs and cypherdoc haters because I had the gall to call the top. It was an extremely tense 4 months of posting; basically me against everyone else. It was so controversial that I would think you'd have gotten involved supporting me if you had indeed sold or gone short like I did. It doesn't make sense you'd stay away given how intense you've been concerning your love of gold and especially silver that you've demonstrated over the last year or so in this very thread.
Posting or not in one thread does not prove or disprove my actions in real life. The world does not revolve around you and your threads. That fact that you seem to think this is the case is very shocking to me. Your using this to base that you think I'm a fraud makes me question your abilities at logic.
Like I said I was highly interested in BTC and the time and had not only sold off all my gold, but my wife's as well to get BTC and mining equipment. I did not care about gold at the time as I did not hold it and was not going to get it anytime soon. I became more interested in gold and silver when silver was getting close to $18.50 my first buy back in point.
I do not love gold or silver. I think it is a smart fraction of any sane persons investment portfolio. I hold 85% Crypto, 10% PMs and 5% cash.
I'm sorry I did not defend you for the difficult 4 months you had on this BTC forum but really that was not my battle. I was busy making money...
Yes making money through the PIRATE PONZI PASS-THROUGH as one of PirateAt40's gateways to "invest" to get the holy 7% per week returns.
Quote
He lost about 40,000 BTC with PirateAt40's Bitcoin Savings and Trust (BTCST)
From smoothie's thread "[FAIL CAPTAIN] Some Facts About Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย" found here, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=119490.0
I get attacked both ways. Anyway, have fun with the personal attacks!
Yes that was me over a year ago. Get over it Goat.
Also...didn't you hit the IGNORE BUTTON? No credibility there I guess or no consistency to keep it that way. Not surprising.