Nothing wrong with repeated themes that are on topic.
The purpose of this thread is for white men of good character to discuss why digital shitcoins are a trojan horse for the Chinese social credit score system because transaction validators are designed to centralize in every single one and why digital slavecoins should be boycotted in favor of physical silver and gold.
So, you do believe there is a future for PMs as compared with bitcoin?
I understand that you keep getting distracted by various other cryptos, and you don't even seem capable of staying focused on bitcoin in terms of your supposed criticism, if you were to actually have one that is boasted by your seemingly irrelevant ongoing talking point (gold and silver, right?)
Regarding gold and silver, I thought that these such Pms would continue to languish, especially due to their lack of portability, difficulties to secure, difficulties to verify purity and difficulties to divide, and likely other problemas.
Furthermore, even though you are emphasizing the physicality aspects of such seemingly outmoded assets, it seems that their various handicaps, that I just outlined above has facilitated an ongoing corruption of them through attempts at digitizing them - or paper inflate them which still leaves a lot of third party risk because no one really feels ready, willing or able to either HODL those physical PMs or to attempt to transact with them - and such current status of physical pms does not seem to improve in future projections - so isn't it off topic to continue to try to compare them to bitcoin? to the extent that you have any kind of ability or willingness to stay on topic.. remember bitcoin is not the same as "shit coins", so at least you could try to stay focused on bitcoin to the extent that you believe your baloney talking points are relevant to this thread in some kind of stretch of the imagination kind of way.