I'm guessing English is not your first language. Which could in part be why there is a slight communication loss. Not that is a criticism at all.
What communication loss? Wasn't it you who said that we should freeze Max Kordek (ceo of lisk) wallet? And then changed your story to voluntary staking idea. I think you have problems with English.
meanwhile Max Kordek ceo of lisk own the biggest byterbal individual wallet, and paid $0. Are you crazy tarmo888?
Let's take a vote to freeze that wallet, and any other huge wallets we know ico managers are holding
I see now that it is a language barrier.
These are separate ideas and not related at all except for the word freeze.
Like my previous example you can not just grab 2 words from 2 different paragraphs and conflate them to mean the same thing.
Like
1. changing the rules in a way that is seen as negatively impacting investors without consultation...
is not the same as
2. changing the rules to benefit investors after full consultation.
You can't say because 1 destroyed trust that 2 would destroy trust also because there are the same words about changing rules in there.
There is no changing my story these are seperate ideas relating to seperate actions.
1. is the taking back an unfair amount of free coins given to someone on the basis of bitcoin that were not even theirs.
2. is relating to the distribution of the 22% remaining via a process that would resemble a tiered pos system with voluntary lockdown by real investors.
these are not mutually exclusive and not even really related.
Please do your best to understand and take time to think it over before replying.
After reading back through our discussion I can honestly say I believe you are confused and not deliberately trying to mislead people.
Can anyone else confirm this person really is a dev working for BB???
How do I know I am not being trolled here