On Bitcointalk, he adds a link to his own website, and on his own website he adds a link tot he original source. He's just using other site's content to get people to his own site.
The link he posts on Bitcointalk doesn't qualify as a source, as it's not linking directly to the original source. I'd say it's plagiarism.
Wait... fo you mean it was posted on a different website and he copied it from there or it's seconds before he posts it on his own site and then here? If he's just stealing other's content and reposting it to his for hits/traffic then that makes this much worse.
I was looking at this the wrong way, he doesn't post the "post time" on his own site, he uses the time from his source. But it's all pretty close together. Take this example:
The cryptocurrency scam thats now high priority for US law enforcement
A special team set up by American officials is targeting SIM swapping scams
The growing problem of SIM swapping has become a major concern for American law
Read more:
~link removed by LoyceV~
His own site (
archived) shows a "Read More" linking to
https://cryptonewsreview.com/the-cryptocurrency-scam-thats-now-high-priority-for-us-law-enforcement/, which was posted on on Nov 8th, 2018 at 6:27 am.
I'm not sure which time zone cryptonewsreview.com uses.
In this case, he uses cryptonewsreview.com's content on his own website, and posts the same content on Bitcointalk to get traffic to his site. I'm pretty sure this is technically plagiarism, so I wouldn't mind seeing him banned.