You're wrong. Because almost all projects indicate such an item. The team can change the rules at any time. What does this mean? That the law of law does not help here.
Do you think that ICO teams should not abide by the laws of most states? So why do they comply with the US and Chinese orders for KYC verification? Moreover, it is so zealous that they demand to pass such an inspection by KYC not only in relation to investors, but also in relation to bounty hunters, in relation to whom they should not conduct such an inspection?
Do you think that ICO teams have the right to ignore the laws and at the same time deceive us?
I wonder why you are protecting the obvious scam?