Nobody is doing the project a favour if deficits are always beautified.
That's why it took almost two years to finally use other names instead of byteball, bytes and blackbytes.
Critics are the most important capital for a project. Where this leads if you ignore them penetratingly can be seen here.
Bite ball offers solutions that nobody currently needs (if at all). But where are those you need?
There won't be mass adoption if you don't focus on the current benefit.
It's true that critics with reason is so much more important than brainless hype for the long term success of a project. However a continuos daily (or even hourly) whining on the levels of "OH MY GOSH I DIDN'T LAMBO YET SO THIS COIN IS A SHIT" is frankly boring and scarcely useful. It must be said that this level of losers posts is quite common these days across the ANN threads of this forum, as most of the coins out there have lost between 80% and 99% of their ATH price and soo many people are soo sorry they didn't dump at ATH and then lambo.
Byteball's developement is moving forwards at a nice pace - that's the only important issue here.