Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s
by
perezoso
on 27/01/2014, 18:51:36 UTC
It's under spec. Not hugely, but significantly.
You mean that it's under spec by 1.25%? And that it is significant?

I don't want to defend HF here, but the only thing under spec that matters is the delivery date.

I wasn't implying anything about the relative importance of the two issues.  Of course if this damn machine had been delivered when promised, it would have been f@rking fantastic... but it wasn't, not by a long shot.  But why don't we keep that side of the discussion in the other thread?

Edit:  Oh, ooops.  I am in the other thread.  Sorry.