We are talking about the RIGHT to be able to vote.
Everyone've right to vote. Even if he've 0 NXT, he can make suggestion to make Nxt stronger. Find a flaw, for example. In decentralized system no one can bound anyone's right to vote.
And the guys which hold a few thousands are able to vote more than the guys which are holding a few cents!
Disagree. The weights of opinions/suggestions/proposals should be placed by
the guys that DO (and decision'll be maked by them as well: coding, installing, buying/selling, anything). Competence!
That's right, you can't place your own weight precisely in close to perfect (IMO) system, cos u're living in subjective reality. In science world u've to prove u're right. In social world u've to convince (community) u're right. That's simple.
THIS IS NATURAL! If the votes are resulting in bad decisions, these decisions were made by those who will loose the most. But then, let it be this way..
Disagree with both statements. It's not natural. It's not OK to build system u expect to fail right away.