Re: Axiom of Resistance (Why Craig Wright is not Satoshi)

I didn't started this to re-new an old hoax story. I'm curious about how other bitcoiners think about this issue.

What were you expecting to get out if this? That the "assumptions that could lead something to be true" expressed in the "Axiom of Resistance" might be applicable in the "assumptions" of Craig Wright to be truly Satoshi?

Actually, I didn't started it to discuss Wright, I used him as an excuse, now I'm realizing that the man is really funny as he is practically engaged in a "taking ownership of bitcoin" program. The man is really stupid by any measure: fake enemy, fake war, fake victory, fake power! Cheesy

Ok, I perceived the argument from the other way around. Haha.

Quote

So, let's talk about Craig Wright a bit more Wink

My argument:
Craig Wright's claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto is ultimately false as he does not support axiom of resistance and is not a bitcoiner, no matter he has or has not access to Satoshi's private keys. His probable access to the keys could be used as an evidence for conspiracy accusations against him in courts.

My answer would be, whether Craig Wright supports the axiom or not is irrelevant. If I express my support for the axiom would that make me Satoshi? How can I be if I don't have the keys to prove I am him?