I think, a lot of us saw Bitcoin like tool for freedom. Now most people look at this like opportunity for enrichment. I dont think that rich equals freedom. I know a many rich peoples. They are far from freedom.
It is now evident that just cryptocurrencies is not sufficient to achieve the goal. We need a State at our side. But current States seek to preserve the old order.
State it is a community with uniform rules. Territorial principle dont need for creation of the State in the 21st century. So what do you think what's to stop us to come together and creation a new State now?
I do not believe so that bitcoin would be the currency of a State for various reasons.
First, cryptocurrencies are regarded by most countries as 'unstable' due to its high volatility in the market. Without having any material or tangible form, relying on digital data or gold seems doubtful for most countries. Unlike GOLD which is tangible and has an innate value due to its natural form, bitcoin has neither.
Second, a country will only shift to a digitalized form of currency if other countries would accept transactions coming out from it. If most countries deny its existence by implementing rules that are prejudicial, then who would adapt it as their currency?
Lastly, some underdeveloped and developing countries have limited access to the internet, which makes it difficult for access to cryptocurrencies (as they exist in the internet!).
Although it may seem impossible for a country to make cryptocurrency as its means of exchange, maybe in the future once technology will embrace change on this aspect then expect bitcoin to be there at the top.