I am now thinking about the question: why is the "author-publisher" relationship a weak link? If this is due to disputes over content, or to be more precise, who is its owner, then how do FidelityHouse developers see this controversial moment?
the meaning of the idea of developers is that the author himself is the master of his content, since high-quality and original content is already seen as an investment in his future and income, which is made up of the popularity of this content.
that is, the copyrights are also transferred into the hands of the content creator and remain with him until a certain point? Indeed, in traditional systems, it is assumed that the author transfers the rights to his publication to the publisher for a specified period, subject to the payment of monetary compensation.