I have been wondering a while about how some ICOs treat their bounty hunters, imagine an ICO projects reduced bounty reward after the bounty program has already ended, sometimes 10X less than the agreed reward. I think if the hunters should have one voice, as in if all bounty hunters are united, they can also stand against the mistreatment from ICO projects. Or what do you guys think?
You must point out what the "Mistreatment" are you talking about! Is this about the late payments or what? As we know ICO's nowadays are struggling hard to even reach the softcap because of this bearish market sentiment. We know that "Bounty Workers" in this particular year is gamble to be paid or not? its our own action and we are all responsible with this, whatever the result is maybe its "GOOD or BAD".