I have been wondering a while about how some ICOs treat their bounty hunters, imagine an ICO projects reduced bounty reward after the bounty program has already ended, sometimes 10X less than the agreed reward. I think if the hunters should have one voice, as in if all bounty hunters are united, they can also stand against the mistreatment from ICO projects. Or what do you guys think?
Payments depend on the team of the project, and bounty hunters will not be able to do anything about them. Even the team of the project may refuse to pay the bounty hunter if they wish. We need projects that accept escrow, then pay for the bounty hunter will be guaranteed