An article about a new patent is indeed interesting if it helps understanding the implications. What is not is to paraphrase that to get traffic. The only mistake of coindesk (the original poster) was to mistakenly link to another patent. But all the dumb sources who stole that article from coindesk paraphrased AND did not even notice the error. Not sure if it was ironical or not but you did too!?! The right patent is: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=10026082.PN.&OS=PN/10026082&RS=PN/10026082