Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
JJG doesnt write posts. He sits and yells into a text to speech microphone. No one would ever type that much without being forced (like in school).
I write every single one of my posts.
One thing, so far, is that i have not been accused of plagerism... hahahahahahaha.. because almost every little word that I type flows through my fingertips.... believe it or not?
Hey QA... since I got you on the line.. I seem to recall that I was pissed off at you for a certain amount of time around December 2015 because you were bragging in the thread and proclaiming to sell a decently large stash of your BTC for christmas shopping.. something like that.. so I recall that presentation from you as being an irritating set of interactions and circumstances because it seemed to be a kind of rubbing in, and even encouraging BTC sales at an inopportune time. Like gloating.
Am I remembering correctly or was that a different year or perhaps a different forum member? Could have been 2014 or even 2016.. but for some reason I seem to recall the situation as 2015.
Woah!
So atleast it sounds like QA change his tune? I'm guessing?
This market is so painful btw.
No. I think that he is largely the same... which means that it is likely that his account has not been SODLed nor compromised... hahahahaha
I can still read such variations of quasi-subdued gloating in his posts that leaks out of the post seams, every once in a while.. .. at least attempting to read the overall contents and tone...
Nonetheless, I do have to say that I did appreciate some of his relatively recent efforts to screen bitcoin maximalists, and to send smerits to largely bitcoin maximalists rather than shit coin pumpers, but I think that he had given up on that angle as long as he could figure out other means of contribution.. I suppose that he could probably elaborate, if he were to conclude that such topic were worthy of any response from his highness. hahahahahhaha
You may have a point - he didn't even give me smerit for the post which he 'agreed' being underrated
I don't know if I am making the same point as you, but I thought that if a forum member is going to publicize some smerit distribution plan, that it would be good for the member to set forth some criteria, and I actually appreciated that initially the criteria that QA set forth, at least initially, was mostly a kind of bitcoin maximalism preference.
On the other hand, even though I saw a lot of members set up threads in which they could set forth smerit distribution criteria (not referring specifically to QA), I did not really consider that setting up such smerit distribution threads to be a fair method to distribute smerit or extra smerits - because I would think that such a set up seems to encourage a kind of self-promotional merit begging.. at least that was something that I considered to be a problematic dynamic, yet surely such practice of setting up such smerit distribution threads was not considered against any forum rules and surely giving smerits has a lot of subjectivity, even for merit sources.
I guess part of the point that I am attempting to make is that the subjectivity aspect of smerit distribution might cause a considerable amount of variance, including just lucky or unlucky timing, and in that regard, no one should really expect to receive any smerits, even from stellar posts. ... but surely, it seems that there are decent odds that with the passage of time, substantive posters are going to tend towards receiving some smerits just by attempting to provide quality engagement.