Vod, it'd be interesting take this a step further to see who among us are known for good contributions vs. harmful contributions.
Perfect examples:
- Spam posts, i.e., those whose posts are brief and therefore low in content or not adding to the discussion
- Abusers of the trust system, i.e., those giving negative trust as a weapon rather than an accurate account of an actual transaction
- Well I can parse all new posts (planned) and I can apply some sort of calculation to them.
(I can't find that thread/website that parsed all a user's posts and displayed a quality score...)
- All I can do is display trust as it is added or removed - I don't know how to track abuse.
:/