Vod, it'd be interesting take this a step further to see who among us are known for good contributions vs. harmful contributions.
Perfect examples:
- Spam posts, i.e., those whose posts are brief and therefore low in content or not adding to the discussion
- Abusers of the trust system, i.e., those giving negative trust as a weapon rather than an accurate account of an actual transaction
Maliciously spreading misinformation is another example, but how would you judge such things?