Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
by
JayJuanGee
on 23/11/2018, 00:37:11 UTC
Who is this amorphous "they" that you are referring to?

It was Micgoossens, obviously. He did it with his army of fifty men.

Tbh, I don't care who was behind it, only that it was resolved.

haha it think i wasn't around here @that time .....

and serious would jjg really be thinking that? (i think even he couldn't make that shit up Smiley )

Pretty much Yefi confirmed that he did not have any information to really substantiate what he was suggesting.

I think that the official story is quite plausible in this situation, which was that Adam left and Admin was having some difficulties managing the thread and complaints and reports.  Initially, theymos took an easy route of closing the thread, but thereafter reconsidered his decision after there were reasonable proposals including the election of a new thread owner (which ended up becoming Infofront - through popular demand).

Personally, the way that it worked out, I think that it was overkill to remove signatures from this thread, and I doubt that the dynamic of the thread would be changed too much by allowing signatures, here.  Also, infofront's relative hands off (but a bit of hands on from time to time) does seem to have caused the thread to continue, even better than when Adam was here.. because sometimes Adam became part of the problem - especially once he became more jaded by some of the BIG blocker nonsense and seemingly largely made up conspiracies about this forum embarking in too much supposed "censorship."

As far as I can tell, what micpeep(bot) says seems accurate that he was NOT involved in the forum on or before the reopening of the WO thread and the then discussions around transition of the thread ownership to infofront.

i did read the thread but wasn't active on it.... i remember the thread was off for a few days etc

but i mean't even JJG can't make this shit up, was about me not beeing one person Roll Eyes

Your clarification doesn't seem to clarify, and I already provided decent explanation regarding you not being what you purport to be - don't get caught up in "not being one person" technicalities because that misses the point.  Also, don't get caught up in some assertions that I am making anything up, because I have merely been stating what my current tentative conclusion are.. which is merely seeming to become repetitive for whatever weight my tentative conclusions have, they have already been made a sufficient number of times... it seems.  In other words, old news.