It might be worth considering that if all you ever do is verbally abuse them, they might not be very receptive to what you're saying. It's not just about having a good idea, it's about how you present it and (particularly in your case) how you conduct yourself while doing so.
...wall of text of accusations and insults.....
Maybe even open with an apology for your behaviour to date. It's not too late to change.
maybe instead of defending them. realise they release code BEFORE community input/conversation.
EG
they had segwit roadmap plan from 2014. before community input
they had code before community got to download.
the comunity had a november 2016-spring 2017 decision and devs lost.
but that was not acceptable to devs. hense the mandatory august 2017.. (no conspiracy. check it all out (i wont use the R word.))
it was not a concept of taking in random community idea's and going with the best one. it was them build thier road map and sway the community to adopt.
you might want to check it all out (i wont use the R word.)
as for me insulting . thats the bear biting the poke. not me poking the bear.
same went for your social drama involvements
if you word count actual insults i give against. say insults you give. you will be surprised by the result
all i said to you before as REPLIES was to re***rch(i know you dont like the word) .. check it out.
you were the one that resorted to flame wars.
anyways. things wont change no matter how much i kiss ass of a dev. the only main issue is that devs should change to be a more OPEN community. and not REKT things that are not their plan..
sorry but letting them lead and control, and require kissing the royal ring is not what decentralisation is about