I have no idea how you think people can do that when most people don't even own fields, animals, or modern capital (the means of production). Our entire criticism of capitalism is based around the disconnect between labor and capital.
Oh, I see so people are entitled to land, animals, and capital now? Who's property rights do you have to violate to provide this capitol to these people by force? Don't tell me no force is involved, because if it was voluntary it would be called charity. Socialism requires taking property rights of some to give to others. This is not even debatable, it is a law of economics. Because of this Socialism will inevitably degrade into totalitarianism as the pool of people who can be robbed shrinks ever smaller until the working class begins eating itself. The only disconnect is in your brain stem where you claim you can entitle people to capital without taking rights from others.
1. It was you who said this is ALREADY being achieved. Please explain how it is being achieved.
2. Socialism doesn't require taking property rights of some to go give to others. Some socialist systems use that means to the end of worker ownership, but the one I subscribe to only distributes
new wealth to the workers who generated it. Over time, it is the workers who accumulate wealth.
When you have absolute beliefs about things and say something always happens, it leads you to being close minded regarding said issue. The idea that you just happened to be born at a time where society has reached a point where everything functions optimally and cannot be improved is naive.