Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
mainline
on 29/01/2014, 15:32:34 UTC
Quote from: VinceSamios on January 29, 2014, 03:12:53 PM
Quote from: mainline on January 29, 2014, 02:24:48 PM
Quote from: VinceSamios on January 29, 2014, 02:21:19 PM
...
0.2w/GH at 40nm... wow... let's hope Ken can get proportionally efficient chips at 28nm... 0.1w/gh should be possible if friedcat can get 0.2w/gh on a 40nm

It doesn't work like that.  Bitfury's 55nm chips aren't half as efficient as today's 28nm chips.  They're *more* power-efficient Smiley
Yes because bitfurys chips have been designed better, hence my hope that ken can make the most of the power efficiency benefits of a smaller process and get down to the theoretical level of about 0.1w/gh

Please.  Let's keep one foot in reality.  The guy can't open his eyes for a publicity shot, can't write above grade-school level, and you think he'll hit the theoretical process efficiency?
ROFL.