That's fair but from what I understand POG will be highly unpredictable on the rewards (according to Rob on the other forum), which also defeats the purpose of having a pool (for predictability).
Regarding the stake of PODC....wouldn't it be simpler to just remove that stake requirement then if that is an issue? (I personally like that stake requirement)
If we removed the stake requirement alone, it would remove 1 piece from the puzzle, but would leave all the rest of the complexity in place.
I will also add that this potential massive increase of coins being liquidated every month (from the foundation tithe) worries me as an investor.
Fair point, and I agree this is a concern, though it could be spread around the month better I think than the current monthly cycle.
I appreciate the discussion and concerns, better to work through them now than after a change is made.
Well that's the thing, I'm not sure what POG is solving compared to what is already there and so far I have not seen any convincing argument for it.
I do not see what POG is currently solving that needs to be solved to make us more attractive (as a coin) and/or that can not be solved by either PODC or heat mining in their current state or with very small modifications. On top of that, I think that resources could be directed to more "critical" areas that would make us more attractive to users. UI/UX improvements, writing letters in the wallet, displaying the children we are supporting there, accountability in the wallet, etc.
From what I see currently, this is just mainly a way to provide more coins to the Foundation which I do not think is the way to go or would make us more attractive. Especially since it keeps adding supply (removal of stake and more coins being liquidated by the foundation) without having any convincing positive effects on the demand.
I say let's wait for more inputs on the question and it will hopefully help us move the discussion forward.