Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
...
The other fact is that we have had a delay with our 28nm ASIC. That's not unique in this industry. We have reacted tio that delay by upgrading this 28nm to full custom design creating a far more efficient ASIC. So to counter your saying I'll offer - one step back, two steps forward.
The other fact is that we have had a delay with our 28nm ASIC. That's not unique in this industry. We have reacted tio that delay by upgrading this 28nm to full custom design creating a far more efficient ASIC. So to counter your saying I'll offer - one step back, two steps forward.
If by "delay" you mean "complete failure" and by "upgrade" you mean "downgrade," you're right on the money
You are now PROMISED a 55nm chip in the spring, instead of HAVING completed 28nm miners now. If you feel that's an "upgrade," the rest of your thrashings on this forum begin to make sense.