Yes Keyser:
631 0.01100000 14gP8 0.01093285 1KXzg
Clearly the credit(s) came from me (14gP8) and went to some https://blockchain.info/address/1KXzgzndQnugs5P8dmao1nj2AVviJQAmFV
The jerk refuses to correct his error.
Of further note, if vegas paid out the way this Matic "Tic, hence bloodsucker" guy pays out, they'd be entirely shutdown in less than 24 hours.
BITBET.US where even if you win, you lose (at least some, if not all).
Furthermore, notice that a winning bet of .011 returns less than the bet itself (despite its weight), if you even happen to get it. Something is clearly seriously wrong with that guy!! It would be nice if someone were to hack him (and all companies industrializing/profiting off the bitcoin with expensive rigs) and donate the bitcoins to charity (bitcoin100 or etc).
The "in" address is where you sent your bet, not where your payment originated.631 0.01100000 14gP8 0.01093285 1KXzg
Clearly the credit(s) came from me (14gP8) and went to some https://blockchain.info/address/1KXzgzndQnugs5P8dmao1nj2AVviJQAmFV
The jerk refuses to correct his error.
Of further note, if vegas paid out the way this Matic "Tic, hence bloodsucker" guy pays out, they'd be entirely shutdown in less than 24 hours.
BITBET.US where even if you win, you lose (at least some, if not all).
Furthermore, notice that a winning bet of .011 returns less than the bet itself (despite its weight), if you even happen to get it. Something is clearly seriously wrong with that guy!! It would be nice if someone were to hack him (and all companies industrializing/profiting off the bitcoin with expensive rigs) and donate the bitcoins to charity (bitcoin100 or etc).
Clearly you paid 0.011 from 1KXz... and received 0.01093285 into the same address. If you didn't have control of the address, you should have specified a different one when you placed the bet.
631 weight is very low, no surprise that the 1% fee caused a net loss.