What exactly am I refusing to listen? I see DT merely as a list of people who are unlikely to scam others. Nothing more. What do I not see here?
users with good judgement
Giving someone positive trust means you think they are unlikely to scam. Adding someone to DT (I hope) means you trust their judgement on others situations, their honesty, morality, and believe they would always strive to do the right thing even when it may not be in their best interest to do so.
Shouldn't it be this way:
"Giving someone positive trust means you think they are unlikely to scam." Exactly. And adding someone on DT means you trust their judgement
to do the same -- nothing more.
Why is DT not like this and why do you think it shouldn't be like this instead of your view of it?
As I commented months ago on the first thread you created on this matter I think a policy non-escalation from you would have been the best from the very beginning.
Agree. I attempted that. Vod misunderstood me. Vod wanted resolve this when he thought I was on DT, but when realizing I was not on DT, he first blackmailed/threatened me and then blocked me. See
the PM conversation.